Marzouk, M and Moselhi, O (2004) Multiobjective optimization of earthmoving operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), pp. 105-113. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a framework for optimizing earthmoving operations using computer simulation and genetic algorithms. It provides a multiobjective optimization tool geared towards selection of near-optimum fleet configurations. The optimization aims at minimizing time and cost of earthmoving operations. The proposed framework considers factors that influence earthmoving operations including equipment availability and project indirect cost, The simulation process, in the proposed methodology, utilizes discrete event simulation and object oriented modeling. The optimization process uses a recently developed genetic algorithm to search for a near-optimum fleet configuration employing Pareto optimality to account for multiobjective optimization. The algorithm considers a set of qualitative and quantitative variables that influence the production of earthmoving operations. The developed framework supports time-cost tradeoff analysis and can assist users in considering what if scenarios with respect to fleet configurations. A numerical example is presented to illustrate a number of practical features of the proposed framework and to demonstrate its capabilities in selecting near-optimum fleet configurations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | algorithms; computer applications; earthmoving; multiple objective analysis; optimization; simulation |
| Index terms: | computer application, discrete event simulation, indirect cost, modelling, earthmoving, computer simulation, tradeoff, genetic algorithm, methodology, configuration |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, cost management, systems engineering, research methods, algorithms, software systems, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, construction operations |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here