Park, M and Peña-Mora, F (2004) Reliability buffering for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(5), pp. 626-637. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Buffering is a common practice in project planning. Project managers or schedulers have used a time contingency to guarantee the completion time of either an activity or a project. This traditional buffering, however, often fails to protect the project schedule performance, resulting in an unnecessary resource idle time. To deal with this problem, reliability buffering, a simulation-based buffering strategy, is presented. Reliability buffering aims to generate a robust construction plan that protects against uncertainties by reducing the potential impact of construction changes. The effectiveness of reliability buffering is examined by simulating a dynamic project model that integrates the simulation approach with the network scheduling approach. The research results indicate that reliability buffering can help achieve a shorter project duration without driving up costs by pooling, resizing, relocating, and recharacterizing contingency buffers. A case study of bridge construction projects also demonstrates how construction projects can benefit from reliability buffering in real world settings. Although further validation is needed, reliability buffering can potentially impact the planning and control of construction projects by improving the consideration of construction feedbacks and characteristics in buffering, and serving as an input to a dynamic project model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buffeting; project management; reliability; simulation |
| Index terms: | case study, project manager, buffer, effectiveness, network scheduling, project management, duration, schedule performance, guarantee, scheduler, strategy, completion time, validation, construction project, project planning, bridge construction |
| Subjects: | operations research, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, control systems, project controls, performance management, contract structure, management, financial risk, infrastructure engineering, project management theory and practice, professional development, production management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Time Control, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here