Sacks, R; Eastman, C M and Lee, G (2004) Process model perspectives on management and engineering procedures in the precast/prestressed concrete industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(2), pp. 206-215. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The preparation of detailed models of information and process flow by 14 member companies of the North American Precast Concrete Software Consortium has provided a unique window into the current management, engineering design, and production operations in this industry. The modeling was performed using the authors' Georgia Tech Process for Product Modeling tool, within the framework of the consortium's effort to develop a precast concrete product model and to specify new integrated three dimensional modeling software. The paper opens with a comparative economic review of precast construction internationally and in North America, which reveals that the market share of precast construction in North American is relatively low. The models are analyzed and aspects of the underlying management procedures that they reveal are discussed, such as types of contracting arrangements, cost estimating, design outsourcing, engineering design communication, mold design, product diversity, and quality control. The results highlight aspects of precast management processes that may be re-engineered through appropriate application of information technology.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete; information technology; precast; prestressed; quality control |
| Index terms: | window, information technology, Georgia, cost estimating, product model, engineering design, precast concrete, modelling, quality control, market share, consortium, outsourcing, concrete industry |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, Geography, design process, partnership management, market analysis, industry analysis, business, computing systems, building materials, modelling and simulation, project delivery, financial and cost management, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here