Shen, L Y; Tam, V W Y; Tam, C M and Drew, D (2004) Mapping approach for examining waste management on construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(4), pp. 472-481. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The increasing awareness of environmental impacts from construction wastes has led to the development of waste management as an important function of construction project management. Various approaches for managing construction wastes have been developed in the existing research works and practices, and these works can be grouped largely into three areas: waste classification, waste management strategies (avoiding waste, reducing waste, reusing waste, and recycling waste), and waste disposal technologies. Nevertheless, these approaches give less attention to the management of the waste handling process on construction sites. In fact, construction wastes pass through a number of processes from generation to final disposal, and proper flow of these processes can improve waste management effectiveness. This paper examines the waste handling process during construction through mapping six cases selected in Hong Kong construction, with the assistance of the free-flow mapping presentation technique. The examination leads to developing a waste management mapping model (WMMM), which incorporates the good operations embodied in the existing practices. The WMMM provides an alterative tool assisting in planning waste management procedures on construction sites. It can serve as a vehicle for comparing the waste management practices between construction sites, thus both good practices and weak areas can be identified.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sites; Hong Kong; mapping; waste management |
| Index terms: | good practice, recycling, Hong Kong, environmental impact, effectiveness, strategy, construction site, waste disposal, construction waste, construction project management, mapping, waste management |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, performance measurement, spatial and geospatial analysis, waste management, management, Geography, environmental engineering, work location, performance management, environmental impact |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here