Shohet, I M and Perelstein, E (2004) Decision support model for the allocation of resources in rehabilitation projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(2), pp. 249-257. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Maintenance management is becoming increasingly important in the building industry. Some of the reasons for this trend are: The large variety of uses for which buildings are constructed, the increase in the number of tall buildings, the increased use of electromechanical systems in buildings, and the higher performance of buildings. Because the financial resources for the maintenance of buildings and infrastructures are always limited, there is a need to find ways to allocate them among the various projects suggested for rehabilitation, renovation, and upgrading of existing buildings. The model developed in the present research to solve the problem of resource allocation is implemented in two stages, namely: (1) elimination of unfeasible solutions and (2) identification of five solution configurations that are close to the optimum. The model may be implemented in either of two ways: (1) maximization of benefits while adhering to a fixed budget or (2) minimization of costs while putting the emphasis on the performance of the buildings. The first approach is suitable for organizations interested in reducing the costs of maintenance. The second approach is suitable for organizations that wish to achieve the highest performance possible. The model developed was tested in a computer decision support system. The resultant solutions were evaluated using a large number of representative cases. The development of the model was finalized after subjecting it to sensitivity analyses. In this way, the effects of variations in conditions on the overall performance and costs were examined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; dynamic programming; maintenance; performance evaluation; rehabilitation |
| Index terms: | variation, configuration, rehabilitation project, performance evaluation, tall building, minimization, decision support, sensitivity analysis, maximization, upgrading, renovation, dynamic programming, building industry, maintenance management, resource allocation, becoming |
| Subjects: | algorithms, maintenance engineering, performance measurement, renovation and retrofit, contractual condition, decision analysis, health conditions and diseases, systems engineering, environmental hazards, industry analysis, philosophical process, construction type, strategic management, resource management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here