Treloar, G J; Love, P E D and Crawford, R H (2004) Hybrid life-cycle inventory for road construction and use. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(1), pp. 43-49. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is a technique that is used worldwide by clients and their design team to assess the impact of their projects on the environment. The main advantage of LCA is in supporting decision making with quantitative data. LCA inventories can be either fully developed or streamlined. Fully developed LCAs are time-consuming and costly to prepare. Streamlined LCAs can be used as an effective decision-making tool when considering environmental performance during the design process, but with a loss of inventory completeness. Acknowledging the advantages and disadvantages of both types of LCA, this paper proposes a hybrid LCA method that uses input-output data to fill in those gaps routinely left in conventional LCA inventories. The developed hybrid LCA method is demonstrated using a life-cycle energy study of eight different road designs, including vehicle manufacture, maintenance, replacement, and operation. It was found that the road construction process was initially the most important, but in the long run the manufacture, use, and maintenance of vehicles using the road (which are an inevitable consequence of road construction) became paramount.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hybrid methods; inventories; life cycles; road construction |
| Index terms: | design process, environmental performance, inventory, life cycle, decision-making, design team, road construction, replacement |
| Subjects: | professional practice, civil engineering, materials science, design methods, inventory management, value management, decision analysis, sustainability assessment |
| Topics: | Project Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here