Tsao, C C Y; Tommelein, I D; Swanlund, E S and Howell, G A (2004) Work structuring to achieve integrated product-process design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(6), pp. 780-789. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents "work structuring," a term used to describe the effort of integrating product and process design throughout the project development process. To illustrate current work structuring practice, we describe a case study involving the installation of door frames into walls in a prison. We analyze why various problems existed. To improve the work structuring effort, we apply the "five whys" to develop local and global fixes for the system of precast walls and door frames. The five whys is a technique to elicit alternative ways of structuring work without being constrained by contractual agreements, traditions, or trade boundaries. We discuss the importance of dimensional tolerances in construction and how these affect the handoff of work from one group of workers to the next. We argue that these constraints and tolerance management practices are so embedded that project participants can miss opportunities to better integrate product and process design. We propose shifting the focus of work structuring from maximizing local trade efficiency to improving overall performance in the delivery system of a capital project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constructability; design/build; fabrication; installation; lean construction; tolerances |
| Index terms: | capital project, project development, constructability, boundaries, management practice, efficiency, lean construction, case study, process design, prison, agreements, fabrication |
| Subjects: | construction integration, building construction, performance management, data collection methods, administrative law, project delivery, property law, strategic project management, design methods, manufacturing engineering, contract formation, management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Site Management, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here