Applying a genetic algorithm-based multiobjective approach for time-cost optimization

Zheng, D X M; Ng, S T and Kumaraswamy, M M (2004) Applying a genetic algorithm-based multiobjective approach for time-cost optimization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(2), pp. 168-176. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Reducing both project cost and time (duration) is critical in a competitive environment. However, a trade-off between project time and cost is required. This in turn requires contracting organizations to carefully evaluate various approaches to attaining an optimal time-cost equilibrium. Although several analytical models have been developed for time-cost optimization (TCO), they mainly focus on projects where the contract duration is fixed. The optimization objective in those cases is therefore restricted to identifying the minimum total cost only. With the increasing popularity of alternative project delivery systems, clients and contractors are targeting the increased benefits and opportunities of seeking an earlier project completion. The multiobjective model for TCO proposed in this paper is powered by techniques using genetic algorithms (GAs). The proposed model integrates the adaptive weights derived from previous generations, and induces a search pressure toward an ideal point. The concept of the GA-based multiobjective TCO model is illustrated through a simple manual simulation, and the results indicate that the model could assist decision-makers in concurrently arriving at an optimal project duration and total cost.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: algorithms; cost control; optimization; project management; time factors
Index terms: duration, project management, project delivery, contracting organization, analytical model, cost control, project cost, cost optimization, genetic algorithm
Subjects: project delivery, financial and cost management, practitioner, project controls, economics, algorithms, theoretical framing, project management theory and practice
Topics: Digital Applications, Time Control, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here