Investigation of bid price competition measured through prebid project estimates, actual bid prices, and number of bidders

Carr, P G (2005) Investigation of bid price competition measured through prebid project estimates, actual bid prices, and number of bidders. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(11), pp. 1165-1172. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Many practitioners today are faced with the task of advising clients on matters that may affect the number of project bidders. An appropriate question may be, does a restriction of bidder participation negatively impact project costs through limiting competition, and to what degree? Intuition and anecdotal evidence suggest that with an increase in the number of bidders vying for a project, the more competitive the low bid offer will be. There is little published evidence and analysis on bid competition impacting cost-effectiveness, although there are numerous reports replete with arguments, assumptions, anecdotal evidence, and bias. This paper critically evaluates public projects, bid under a condition of free, open, and unfettered competition. This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the impact of reduced competition on project bid prices. By selecting a single building type, designed by a single firm, with prebid estimates prepared from the same estimating database, over a limited time period, the investigation attempts to control model variance. The study found that reducing the number of bidders will result in increased project bid prices.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bids; competition; engineering education; labor relations
Index terms: investigation, bidder, labour relation, estimate, variance, engineering education, database, practitioner, competition, evidence, bias, public project, intuition, estimating, quantitative analysis, number of bidders, cost-effectivenes, project cost
Subjects: market analysis, data management, measurement and scaling, professional education, cognitive psychology, infrastructure engineering, probability and distributions, economics, data analysis and analytics, bidding, financial and cost management, practitioner, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Education, Digital Applications, Supply Chain Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here