Interface management for China's build-operate-transfer projects

Chan, W T; Chen, C; Messner, J I and Chua, D K H (2005) Interface management for China's build-operate-transfer projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(6), pp. 645-655. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Stringent pressure on public finances has made China's infrastructure development a "bottleneck" in its bid to sustain rapid economic growth. As a result, many modalities have been developed to utilize the resources and skills of the private sector to supply essential infrastructure products and services, as well as to improve the efficiency in government procurement of the same. The build-operate-transfer (BOT) approach is an important example of these innovative modalities. The BOT approach in China is still in its infancy; many pitfalls await the unwary and obstacles impede more extensive application of this modality. The pitfalls are attributable to the complexities in the BOT approach, particularly when attempted in China's transition economy emerging from decades of central planning to become one that is more market driven and globally integrated. This paper proposes two systems concepts to help manage this complexity: (1) a process modeling approach that maps key functions, parameters and interfaces in the project delivery process, and (2) the use of interface management involving specific measures that have contributed towards project success in Chinese BOT projects. The process modeling approach has led to the development of China's BOT generic process model (CBGPM). Expert opinion was elicited on the criticality of the interfaces identified in CBGPM as well as the effectiveness of selected interface management measures. Finally, an interface management framework consisting of five key steps is suggested for China's BOT projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: build/operate/transfer; China; infrastructure; interfaces; project management
Index terms: efficiency, central planning, project success, private sector, government procurement, effectiveness, build-operate-transfer, economic growth, project delivery, project management, process modelling, maps, infrastructure development, interface management, China, complexity, transition economy
Subjects: business, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, project delivery, design analysis, Geography, project management theory and practice, infrastructure engineering, economic development, performance management, spatial and geospatial analysis, procurement strategy, industry analysis, systems engineering
Topics: Quality Management, International Construction, Design Practice, Procurement, Governance, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here