Prediction of organizational effectiveness in construction companies

Dikmen, I; Birgonul, M T and Kiziltas, S (2005) Prediction of organizational effectiveness in construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(2), pp. 252-261. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Investigation of literature on organizational effectiveness (OE) reveals that the researchers have been in consensus for the difficulty of defining, modeling, and measuring OE, which is important for attaining high performance. Major focuses of this paper are, therefore, to construct a conceptual framework to model OE, to derive major determinants of OE from this framework, and to measure OE by constructing prediction models based on artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple regression (MR) techniques. Based on the proposed framework that investigates OE from the perspectives of organization and its subsystems, business, and macroenvironments, the most significant variables that determine OE have been collected and used as inputs for the two prediction models, which have been constructed by using the information associated with 116 Turkish construction companies obtained from a designed survey. According to the prediction results and comparative study, ANN slightly outperformed the MR model in terms of errors, correlations between desired versus actual outputs, and relations between input-output parameters. The ANN model is proposed for use as a tool to assess company effectiveness and to guide decision makers about the major determinants of OE to increase firm performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: management methods; models; neural networks; organizations; Turkey
Index terms: Turkey, survey, multiple-regression, effectiveness, comparative study, management method, organizational effectiveness, neural network, artificial neural network, conceptual framework, firm performance, modelling, investigation, construction company, prediction model, determinant
Subjects: risk assessment, statistical analysis, Geography, data collection methods, business analysis, management, business, research design and methodology, artificial intelligence, organization, analytical methods, prediction and forecasting, performance management, theoretical framing, modelling and simulation
Topics: Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Quality Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here