Automating schedule review for expressway construction

Dzeng, R J; Tserng, H P and Wang, W C (2005) Automating schedule review for expressway construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), pp. 127-136. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

An expressway project is often divided into subprojects with different tendering packages, and carried out by several general contractors that apply different scheduling practices. Each schedule may contain hundreds of activities, each of which is associated with multiple pay items that determine its earned monetary value. With such huge amount of information, the reviewer can only check a sample piece of information, and the quality of review highly depends on the reviewer's experience and devotion. Automated schedule review provides a solution to reduce such problems encountered in the industry. This paper presents a module-based schedule generation and review model, which includes a predefined set of network modules, network builder assistant computer system that helps schedulers manage and reuse the modules to build a new schedule, and another computer system network review assistant (NRA) that helps reviewers review schedules. The NRA uses generalized rule forms to represent the schedule critique knowledge collected from the industry. When potential errors are found, the NRA adopts case-based reasoning to suggest possible correction based on similar cases. The evaluation conducted by the practitioners using real projects indicates that NRA reduces review time, and provides more accurate review on finding activities and related pay items not conforming to standards, and reminding users of important but often omitted activities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: automation; highway construction; scheduling
Index terms: practitioner, builder, general contractor, scheduling, case-based reasoning, scheduler, computer system, automation, module, highway construction, critique, package
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, computing systems, operations research, contractual arrangements, civil engineering, architectural elements, automation and robotics, cognitive psychology
Topics: Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here