El-Rayes, K and Hyari, K (2005) Optimal lighting arrangements for nighttime highway construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(12), pp. 1292-1300. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a decision support system for optimizing temporary lighting arrangements in nighttime highway construction projects. The system is developed as a multiobjective genetic algorithm that is capable of: (1) maximizing average illuminance on construction sites; (2) maximizing lighting uniformity in the work zone; (3) minimizing glare to workers and road users; and (4) minimizing lighting costs. The system is designed to support decision makers in their search for practical lighting arrangements that provide various tradeoffs among these four conflicting objectives. Five decision variables are optimized in the present system, namely: number of lighting equipment, equipment positioning, mounting height, aiming angle, and rotation angle. The system is also designed to consider and satisfy all practical constraints that can be encountered in this lighting design problem. An application example is analyzed to illustrate the use of the system and demonstrate its capabilities in generating near optimal and practical lighting arrangements for nighttime highway construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | algorithms; decision support systems; highway construction; light; artificial; nighttime construction; optimization |
| Index terms: | glare, tradeoff, genetic algorithm, highway construction, illuminance, decision support, construction site |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, algorithms, work location, civil engineering, building performance |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here