Estimating the acceptability of new formwork systems using neural networks

Elazouni, A M; Ali, A E and Abdel-Razek, R H (2005) Estimating the acceptability of new formwork systems using neural networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), pp. 33-41. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Continual development in construction techniques results in emergence of specialized formwork systems. A new system will have to compete with in-use systems for adoption in a target operation. Thus, it is essential that decision makers anticipate the acceptability of new systems before making decisions to acquire them. Estimating acceptability basically assesses how features of a new system are comparable to that of in-use systems. Therefore, analogy is a focal factor for the acceptability estimating process. Neural networks (NNs) are more suitable to model construction problems requiring analogy-based solutions. A NN-based approach was employed to anticipate the acceptability of new formwork systems. The study collected data from a group of 40 users in Egypt. A set of six performance characteristics that mostly pertain to acceptability estimating were identified. The study used the analytical hierarchy process to produce pairs of a performance characteristics' vector and the corresponding acceptability value, and utilized the developed pairs to train NNs. Finally, tests on trained NNs using unseen data indicated satisfactory performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; data collection; decision making; Egypt; neural networks
Index terms: artificial intelligence, decision-making, estimating, emergence, neural network, Egypt, formwork, analytical hierarchy process
Subjects: Geography, decision analysis, systems engineering, artificial intelligence, decision-making and optimization, building construction, financial and cost management
Topics: Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here