Gill, N; Tommelein, I D; Stout, A and Garrett, T (2005) Embodying product and process flexibility to cope with challenging project deliveries. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(4), pp. 439-448. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Four factors make it challenging to manage semiconductor fabrication facility ("fabs") projects: technical complexity of the product design, need to compress the project duration, need to reduce upfront costs, and unexpected project changes. The strategies employed by practitioners to cope with these challenges form an intricate puzzle. We empirically develop a framework that provides a structure for helping to solve this puzzle, which comprises two principles: investing upfront in a flexible product design and structuring a flexible process. Empirical findings reveal that project teams make commitments early on by overdesigning but also postpone critical decisions by differentiating the scope of their work. Project teams employ other strategies such as increasing communication, using modular architectures, engaging in four-dimensional computer-based modeling, and fabricating components and subsystems off-site. Our analysis yields understanding on the purposes and performance tradeoffs of these strategies, and on how they embody the two principles. Project managers may find the framework useful when deciding which strategies best suit other equally challenging projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision making; delivery; project management |
| Index terms: | product design, tradeoff, commitment, strategy, practitioner, semiconductor, decision-making, complexity, project manager, project delivery, fabrication, project team, project management, modelling, duration |
| Subjects: | psychology, innovation and technology management, electrical systems, analytical methods, project delivery, profession, practitioner, project controls, decision analysis, systems engineering, manufacturing engineering, management, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here