Goodrum, P M and Dai, J (2005) Differences in occupational injuries, illnesses, and fatalities among Hispanic and non-Hispanic construction workers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(9), pp. 1021-1028. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that one in four persons in the United States will be of Hispanic origin by 2050, up from one in eight in 2002. Driven by immigration, this dramatic growth in the Hispanic population will present unique challenges in the workplace. In construction, the increase in the Hispanic population has enabled the industry to meet its workforce demands. Unfortunately, this has occurred with costs in the health and safety of Hispanic construction workers. Using data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' current population survey, current employment survey, survey of occupational injuries and illnesses, and census of fatal occupational injuries, this study examines relative differences in injuries, illnesses, and fatalities between Hispanic and non-Hispanic construction workers by occupation. The findings show that differences in injuries, illnesses, and fatalities exist between Hispanic and non-Hispanic construction workers, although not always unfavorably toward Hispanics, and the difference does vary by occupation. The implication of the increasing size of the Hispanic construction workforce with respect to construction safety and health training needs is discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fatalities; injuries; labor; minority groups; occupational safety; statistics |
| Index terms: | statistics, survey, illness, fatalities, health and safety, employment, population, estimate, United States, injury, construction worker, economic indicator, occupation, training need, minority, construction safety and health, occupational safety |
| Subjects: | practitioner, management, health conditions and diseases, health risk and incident analysis, health safety and environment, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, sociology, educational resources, occupational health and safety management, Geography, mathematical modelling, financial and cost management, environmental health, demography |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Ethics, Human Resources, Education, Research Practice, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here