Gunhan, S and Arditi, D (2005) International expansion decision for construction companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8), pp. 928-937. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
There exist several reasons for construction firms to expand their business into international markets. But the complex international environment is affected by diverse factors and creates risks that are not well understood by companies that are active mostly in domestic markets. It is therefore essential for construction companies to follow a disciplined and well-informed strategy when deciding whether to enter international markets. Company strengths relative to conducting business in international markets, the threats and opportunities associated with overseas work, and the costs and benefits of undertaking construction projects in specific countries need to be considered in this decision. The interactions between the complex factors can be structured in a model that can help one to make a rational judgment. The International Expansion Decision Model developed in this study is based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) improved by the addition of a Delphi survey. The main objective of this research study is to facilitate the entry decision into foreign markets and to highlight the importance of the factors involved in this decision. This study is of relevance to practitioners as it allows executives of construction companies to test if their company is ready for expansion into international markets in general and into a specific country in particular. It is also of relevance to researchers as it demonstrates the successful use of the combined Delphi and AHP methods.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | engineering firms; foreign countries; risk management |
| Index terms: | international expansion, strategy, engineering firm, construction company, construction firm, construction project, practitioner, Delphi survey, judgment, risk management, executive, international market, markets, interaction |
| Subjects: | development economics, firms, production management, management, behavioral psychology, practitioner, dispute resolution, organization, business, risk assessment, data collection methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, International Construction, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here