Hinze, J; Huang, X and Terry, L (2005) The nature of struck-by accidents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(2), pp. 262-268. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction accidents are broadly categorized into five basic groups, namely falls (from elevation), shock (electrical), caught in/between, struck-by, and other. "Struck-by" accidents accounted for 22% of all construction-related fatalities recorded by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration between 1985 and 1989. Recent (1997 to 2000) data show that the percentage of struck-by accidents constituted 24.6% of the fatalities and serious construction worker injuries. Struck-by accidents primarily involve workers struck by equipment, private vehicles, falling materials, vertically hoisted materials, horizontally transported materials, and trench cave ins. Determining possible causation factors of these accident types is often difficult, due to the broad categories utilized in the accident coding system. This study resulted in gaining insights about the root causes of the struck-by injuries. By finding the root causes, effective methods for accident prevention can be developed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accident prevention; construction site accidents; injuries; occupational safety |
| Index terms: | accident prevention, construction site accident, injury, occupational safety, construction accident, construction worker, fatalities, occupational safety and health, falls |
| Subjects: | environmental health, health risk and incident analysis, practitioner, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here