Kululanga, G K and Price, A D F (2005) Measuring quality of writing of construction specifications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(8), pp. 859-865. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The quality of writing of construction specifications is one of the greatest challenges facing construction contractors or their representatives in today's business environment. Writers of construction specifications have been criticized for their contribution toward construction disputes. Although the construction business environment has moved toward modernization of some of its business processes, claims arising from construction specifications continue to rise. Equally, a written exposition of a quantitative instrument that measures the quality of writing of construction specifications is not available in the literature. Thus the construction industry needs to develop methodologies for measuring the quality of writing of construction specifications that should overcome their current underper-formance in this area. This paper presents the procedures that underlie the quality of writing of construction specifications, gives a management tool for facilitating its measurement, and also presents the results of construction contractors' practices regarding the quality of said writing. The results show that the surveyed Malawian construction contractors were in the process of putting in place principles to govern the quality of writing of construction specifications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; measurement; specifications; writing |
| Index terms: | methodology, construction contractor, specification, construction dispute, construction industry |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, practitioner, industry analysis, contractual condition, research methods |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here