Constructing relationally integrated teams

Kumaraswamy, M M; Ling, F Y Y; Rahman, M M and Phng, S T (2005) Constructing relationally integrated teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), pp. 1076-1086. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Worldwide initiatives to improve construction industry performance converge on the common need for more effective team-working. This is increasingly critical in the context of complex multiparticipant construction projects. Clashes of organizational, operational, national, and/or professional cultures point to the need for "relational integration" as a prerequisite for such synergistic teamworking. This paper draws on recent approaches to promoting trust and cooperation through (1) basic teambuilding techniques in general and (2) partnering and alliancing in construction projects. It then focuses on analyzing the views of Singapore-based contractors as derived from a survey to elicit the hypothesized 28 factors facilitating relationally integrated teambuilding, and 31 factors deterring such integration in construction project teams. On the whole: (1) 27 of the 28 factors facilitating integrated project team, and 26 of the 31 factors deterring integrated project team, are significant; (2) these two sets of factors could be represented by four and five "broad factors," respectively; and (3) except in a few cases, respondents from large and medium companies, as well as with and without experience in RC, have similar perceptions of the importance levels of different factors. These two sets of critical factors, as identified in this paper, complement two other previously isolated sets of factors that facilitate or deter a "relational contracting" culture. Taken together, they feed into a consolidated strategy for releasing the latent energies and potential synergies that should yield the much higher construction project performance levels that have been called for worldwide.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; contactors; Hong Kong; integrated systems; procurement; Singapore; teamwork
Index terms: integrated team, cooperation, construction project, integration, strategy, survey, integrated system, project team, synergy, critical factor, relational integration, Hong Kong, alliancing, partnering, Singapore, relational contracting, construction project team, construction industry performance, teamwork
Subjects: psychology, contractual arrangements, supply chain integration, project delivery, data collection methods, risk assessment, design methods, organizational analysis, partnership management, industry analysis, management, production management, Geography
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here