Nassar, K M; Nassar, W M and Hegab, M Y (2005) Evaluating cost overruns of asphalt paving project using statistical process control methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(11), pp. 1173-1178. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
While some projects will experience changes to the contracted cost by deduction or additions, construction cost overruns are becoming a common problem in the construction industry. Steps need to be taken to minimize cost overrun through cost and quality control techniques. This paper presents a study conducted to evaluate construction cost overruns of asphalt paving operations performed by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). The main objective is to analyze the main causes of cost overruns and evaluate the amount of cost overrun of asphalt paving operations, using statistical process control (SPC) techniques. Real data from projects in the year 2000 were collected from IDOT. These data contain cost information of 219 projects. The results indicate that the average cost overrun for the sample collected was 4% above the bid price. Reasons for cost overruns are analyzed and a Pareto chart and a cause and effect diagram are constructed. Individuals and Moving Range (MR) control charts are developed and their interpretation and use are discussed. Furthermore, the benefits and limitations of using the individuals and MR chart in cost control applications are pointed out. It is recommended that SPC analysis be an integral part in managing and controlling project costs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asphalt pavements; cost control; project management |
| Index terms: | asphalt pavement, paving, project cost, overrun, cost control, process control, cost information, becoming, construction cost, cost overrun, construction industry, quality control, project management |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, philosophical process, transportation engineering, project controls, project management theory and practice, accounting and finance, economics, project delivery, financial and cost management, control systems |
| Topics: | Time Control, Quality Management, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here