Crew production rates for contract time estimation: Bent footing, column, and cap of highway bridges

O'Connor, J T and Huh, Y (2005) Crew production rates for contract time estimation: Bent footing, column, and cap of highway bridges. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(9), pp. 1013-1020. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Both the importance and process of estimating highway construction time have increased in significance as roadway user costs themselves have become more significant. In estimating construction time, few parameters are more significant than work item crew production rates and factors significantly affecting the rates. A standardized data collection tool was used to acquire a total of 93 data points from 22 ongoing Texas highway projects between February 2002 and May 2004, for selected critical work items: Footing, column-rectangle, column-round, and cap. With the data, several hypothesized drivers of the crew production rates were analyzed. The statistically significant drivers found from the analyses include: footing size (m 3/ea), excavation depth (m), and number (No.) of footings per bent for footing work item; column size (m 3/ea), column height (m), No. of columns per bent for column-rectangle; column height (m), diameter (m), and No. of columns per bent for column-round; cap size (m 3/ea), cap length (m), and shape of cap (rectangle versus inverted T) for cap. Findings from this study will enable highway agencies to enhance accuracy of contract time estimation for highway bridge construction. The methodology for obtaining field-based production rates will also be beneficial for future researchers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge construction; bridges; highway; contracts; estimation; productivity; quantitative analysis; time factors
Index terms: column, accuracy, excavation, methodology, time estimation, estimating, bridge construction, quantitative analysis, agency, estimation, productivity, highway construction, construction time
Subjects: financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, construction operations, operations research, sociology, project controls, professional development, infrastructure engineering, research methods, civil engineering, management, structural engineering
Topics: Site Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here