Oliveros, A V O and Fayek, A R (2005) Fuzzy logic approach for activity delay analysis and schedule updating. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), pp. 42-51. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a fuzzy logic model that integrates daily site reporting of activity progress and delays, with a schedule updating and forecasting system for construction project monitoring and control. The model developed assists in the analysis of the effects of delays on a project's completion date and consists of several components: An as-built database integrated with project scheduling; a list of potential causes for delays; a procedure to categorize delays; a method of estimating delay durations utilizing fuzzy logic; a procedure that updates the schedule; and, a procedure that evaluates the effects and likely consequences of delays on activity progress. This model is of relevance to researchers since it makes a contribution in project scheduling by developing a complete approach for handling the uncertainty inherent in schedule updating and activity delay analysis. It also advances the application of fuzzy logic in construction. It is of relevance to construction industry practitioners since it provides them with a useful technique for incorporating as-built data into the schedule, assessing the impact of delays on the schedule, and updating the schedule to reflect the consequences of delays and corrective actions taken. The use of fuzzy logic in the model allows linguistic and subjective assessments to be made, and thereby suits the actual practices commonly used in industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computer aided scheduling; critical path method; databases; fuzzy sets; project management |
| Index terms: | fuzzy set, database, fuzzy logic, forecasting, duration, construction industry, project management, monitoring, project scheduling, scheduling, critical path method, estimating, construction project, practitioner, delay analysis |
| Subjects: | operations research, data science, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, practitioner, control systems, project controls, data management, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, production management, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here