Shapira, A and Goldenberg, M (2005) AHP-based equipment selection model for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(12), pp. 1263-1273. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Selection of equipment for construction projects, a key factor in the success of the project, is a complex process. Current models offered by the literature fail to provide adequate solutions for two major issues: the systematic evaluation of soft factors, and the weighting of soft benefits in comparison with costs. This paper presents a selection model based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a multiattribute decision analysis method, with a view to providing solutions for these two issues. The model has the capacity to handle a great number of different criteria in a way that truly reflects the complex reality, to incorporate the context and unique conditions of the project, and to allow for manifestation of user experience and subjective perception. The model was implemented in an in-house developed system that was improved and validated through testing by senior professionals. The main academic contribution of the study is in the modification of AHP to correspond with the nature of equipment selection and in its utilization as an effective means for the formalization of knowledge possessed by competent, experienced practitioners. On the practical side, the proposed model offers an efficient, convenient tool that forces the users into orderly, methodical thinking, guides them in making logical, consistent decisions, and provides a facility for all necessary computations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction equipment; cost control; decision making |
| Index terms: | construction equipment, equipment selection, testing, multiattribute decision analysis, practitioner, computation, decision-making, construction project, cost control, user experience |
| Subjects: | professional practice, financial and cost management, practitioner, computational methods, user-centered design, decision analysis, production management, procurement capability, construction equipment |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Cost Management, Plant and Equipment, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here