Comparative analysis of shoring towers for high-clearance construction

Shapira, A and Raz, Y (2005) Comparative analysis of shoring towers for high-clearance construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(3), pp. 293-301. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Formwork for cast-in-place concrete in high-clearance construction is commonly based on multitier shoring towers. The market has responded to the demand for shoring towers by offering numerous proprietary models, from which the constructor can choose. Thus, there is a need for comparative data and selection criteria that are comprehensive, objective, uniformly processed, and systematically organized. This paper presents methodology, formatted data, and findings that purport to assist constructors in rationally selecting the appropriate shoring towers for their projects. For the benefit of industry practitioners, the paper offers an overview of tower configuration and classification, a formatted list of selection criteria generated on the basis of input from formwork manufacturers, and interviews with representatives of formwork service companies, examples of comparative data on selected tower models, and quantitative comparisons based on the introduction of normalized parameters and on formwork solutions for typical cases. This information is particularly vital given the high cost of tower-based formwork relative to the overall construction cost of the supported concrete element, while published srection and dismantling work input data are largely still unavailable for most models and heights of shoring towers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete construction; formwork; shoring; towers
Index terms: manufacturer, interview, comparative analysis, practitioner, dismantling, configuration, methodology, concrete construction, formwork, construction cost, selection criteria
Subjects: systems engineering, building construction, research methods, tendering, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, operations management, practitioner, data collection methods
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here