Walsh, K D; Sawhney, A and Brown Iv, A (2005) International comparison of cost for the construction sector: Purchasing power parity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(2), pp. 160-167. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The importance of the construction sector in national economies around the globe and the global nature of the industry require a prudent international comparison of construction costs. From the view of international construction ventures, cost comparisons have generally been accomplished using published currency exchange rates. Global organizations dealing with development aid and the comparison of the gross domestic product (GDP) of nations have used an approach that has its roots in established econometric theories. This approach is based on the Casselian purchasing power parity (PPP) doctrine that essentially conducts the comparison based on the local purchasing power of currencies, as opposed to exchange rates. The World Bank, which conducts the GDP comparison, uses the PPP-based approach to compare construction sector output. This paper provides an overview of the background and application of PPP and its use for international cost comparisons conducted for various nations. Methods currently used for construction cost comparisons are reviewed. A critical review of domestic construction cost comparison approaches is provided with the intent to identify the key differences between temporal and spatial comparisons. Case studies of construction cost factors are used to demonstrate the importance of PPP-based cost comparisons for construction economics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction costs; cost estimates; economic analysis; financial management; international factors |
| Index terms: | gross domestic product, case study, financial management, World Bank, domestic construction, construction cost, purchasing, international construction, national economy, econometric, cost estimate, international comparison, construction economics, economic analysis, construction sector |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, institutional frameworks, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, design analysis, data collection methods, construction type, strategic management, financial analysis, procurement strategy, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Governance, Procurement, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Design Practice, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here