Wibowo, A and Kochendörfer, B (2005) Financial risk analysis of project finance in Indonesian toll roads. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(9), pp. 963-972. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
If a project is implemented using a project-finance approach, the debt service payment relies solely on the project cash flows and its assets. This paper identifies, quantifies, and evaluates major financial risks associated with project-financed toll road projects in Indonesia. Ordering payments by priority level, subject to cash availability, enables risk to be evaluated from the different perspectives of multiple parties involved. The paper makes use of Latin Hypercube simulations for risk analysis because they deal with problems involving large and complex systems. To better illustrate the concept, a case study is presented. A sensitivity analysis of the impact of delay-in-adjustment risk and of the adoption of a new regulation related to the toll adjustment is performed and discussed. Simulation results show that the project sponsor fares worse as delay-in-adjustment risk increases but that the creditor can fare better, given that the risk level is low or moderate. Output statistics also reveal that the adoption of the new regulation has negative impact on the project cash flows from both the project sponsor's and the creditor's perspectives under different scenarios associated with delay-in-adjustment risk.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | build/operate/transfer; financing; Indonesia; risk analysis; simulation; toll roads |
| Index terms: | complex system, case study, Indonesia, road project, statistics, toll, sensitivity analysis, project sponsor, cash flow, financing, project finance, risk analysis, regulation |
| Subjects: | financial management, infrastructure engineering, Geography, sociology, political science, systems engineering, transportation engineering, environmental hazards, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Governance, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here