Pile construction productivity assessment

Zayed, T M and Halpin, D W (2005) Pile construction productivity assessment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(6), pp. 705-714. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Bored piles are vital elements for highway bridge foundation. A large number of factors oversees productivity and cost estimation processes for piles, which creates many problems for the time and cost estimators of such process. Therefore, current study is designed to diagnose these problems and assess productivity, cycle time, and cost for pile construction using the artificial neural network (ANN). Data were collected for this study through designated questionnaires, site interviews, and telephone calls to experts in different construction companies. Many variables have been considered to manage the piling construction process. Three-layer, feed forward, and fully connected ANNs were trained with an architecture of seven input neurons, five output neurons, and different hidden layer neurons. The ANN models were validated and proved their robustness in output assessments. Three sets of charts have been developed to assess productivity, cycle time, and cost. This research is relevant to both industry practitioners and researchers. It provides sets of charts for practitioners' usage to schedule and price out pile construction projects. In addition, it provides researchers with a methodology of applying ANN to pile construction process, its limitation, and future suggestions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bored piles; costs; neural networks; pile foundations; productivity
Index terms: construction process, methodology, construction project, practitioner, questionnaire, interview, cost estimating, neural network, construction company, pile foundation, artificial neural network, construction productivity, cost estimator, feed forward, productivity
Subjects: data collection methods, profession, organization, control systems, practitioner, operations management, modelling and simulation, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, management, structural engineering, research methods, production management, building construction
Topics: Digital Applications, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here