Bai, Y and Burkett, W R (2006) Rapid bridge replacement: Processes, techniques, and needs for improvements. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), pp. 1139-1147. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 and subsequent potential threats to the United States transportation systems have presented an urgent need to develop emergency response plans in order to quickly react to the possible consequences of an extreme event. Highway bridges, as critical components of the nation's transportation network, have received increased attention. To respond to the potential threats on highway bridges, a research project was conducted to identify rapid bridge replacement processes, techniques, and needs for improvements. To achieve the research objectives, the research team studied three cases of previous bridge replacements following extreme events. By studying these cases, the research team first sought to identify and expand on lessons learned and then addressed which actions did and did not work effectively under the incident circumstances. Using the lessons learned government agencies and engineering and construction communities could enhance their emergency response plans for future incidents. Next, the research team identified needed improvements so that the research community could investigate new technologies to advance current practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bridge construction; bridge design; bridges; highway; emergency services; New York; Oklahoma; Pennsylvania; rehabilitation |
| Index terms: | bridge construction, extreme event, emergency response plan, lessons learned, New York, new technology, replacement, construction community, bridge design, government agency, United States |
| Subjects: | administrative law, materials science, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems, infrastructure engineering, health safety and environment, Geography, innovation and technology management, professional development |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here