East, E W and Liu, L Y (2006) Multiproject planning and resource controls for facility management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(12), pp. 1294-1305. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Facility managers face the challenges of managing many different types of small, geographically dispersed construction projects. Depending on the complexity and distribution of projects, the time required to prepare for production consumes a large percentage of the total time required to complete the job. Increasing crews' productive hours is a key objective when planning multiproject schedules. Existing methods, however, lack the effective means to explicitly model, analyze, and optimize resource utilization for these multiple concurrent projects. As a result, few facility managers fully exploit the potential to better manage their often limited budget and resources. This paper presents an explicit model of the mobilization requirements of multiple crews performing a variety of different activities over a geographic space. The model allows the facility manager to explicitly investigate the impact of crew composition, crew specialization, and depot locations. Using work rule decisions regarding alternative crew allocations, facility managers may dynamically allocate resources to optimize resources and to complete projects in a minimum amount of time. To verify and validate this new model, a computerized system, called FIRS (Facility/Infrastructure Resource Scheduler), was created to analyze the multiproject resource plans with data from two military organizations and a university campus. FIRS utilizes a new genetic algorithm that was developed specifically to work with multiproject scheduling. Using FIRS, facility managers can develop and test alternative crew allocations based on the qualifications of the crews available and the type of operation being performed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | facilities; project management; resource management |
| Index terms: | resource management, project management, resource utilization, resource control, qualification, construction project, complexity, computerized system, manager, scheduler, specialization, genetic algorithm, scheduling, face, crew allocation |
| Subjects: | business, computing systems, practitioner, control systems, psychology, operations research, site logistics, management, educational resources, algorithms, production management, project management theory and practice, project controls, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Education, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here