Classifying construction contractors using unsupervised-learning neural networks

Elazouni, A M (2006) Classifying construction contractors using unsupervised-learning neural networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(12), pp. 1242-1253. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Contractor prequalification involves the screening of contractors by a project owner to determine their competence to complete the project on time, within budget, and to expected quality standards. The process of prequalification involves a large number of contractors, each being represented by many attributes. A neural network model was applied to aid in the prequalification process by classifying contractors into groups based on similarity in performance using the financial ratios of liquidity, activity, profitability, and leverage. Contractors are represented in this model by patterns in four-dimensional space. Patterns of similar performance tend to form clusters intercepting regions of low pattern density in between. A neuron with weights is used as a classifier to set a decision boundary between clusters. The method basically iterates the neuron weights to move the decision boundary to a place of low pattern density. Then, the statistical hypothesis testing of the mean difference of two independent samples was used to validate the classification of the parent class to the two child classes considering the four ratios separately. The method was used hierarchically to classify a group of 245 contractors into classes of small numbers. Finally, the inferred procedure of classification proves that the neural network model classified the four-dimension pattern representing contractors efficiently.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; classification; contractors; financial management; neural networks; selection; statistics
Index terms: neural network, financial ratio, construction contractor, competence, screening, owner, quality standard, financial management, density, liquidity, artificial intelligence, dimension, statistics, testing, profitability
Subjects: sociology, quality assurance, management, personnel development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, analytical methods, artificial intelligence, professional practice, mathematical modelling, practitioner
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here