Fong, P S W and Chu, L (2006) Exploratory study of knowledge sharing in contracting companies: A sociotechnical perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(9), pp. 928-939. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
According to Dede Bonner in 2000, employees hold a wealth of knowledge and experience about their companies, including the products, customers, internal processes, histories, technologies, and competitors. But this knowledge is usually dispersed across scattered individuals and locations. Although learning happens at an individual level, it is usually as a one-time event, without an organizational context or a sense of continuity. Knowledge is kept in people's minds but not shared in an organization. Not until the 20th century did people start to realize that knowledge is critical to the success of a company and considered to be the pivotal point for aggressive organizational growth in today's highly competitive marketplace. This is also true for the Hong Kong construction industry. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the current situation of knowledge sharing at the departmental level in contracting companies, this research was carried out with the aims of investigating the main barriers to and finding out the critical factors for and benefits resulting from effective knowledge sharing in the tendering departments of contracting companies in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. The research reviews existing theories of knowledge and knowledge sharing. It seeks to contribute to the theory of organizational knowledge sharing by providing an explorative account supported by empirical evidence. It also allows management to continuously anticipate and support knowledge sharing activities related to the successful management of construction projects within their particular organizations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bids; construction companies; contracts; Hong Kong; social factors |
| Index terms: | history, evidence, construction project, construction company, exploratory study, knowledge sharing, United Kingdom, construction industry, critical factor, social factor, Hong Kong |
| Subjects: | sociology, industry analysis, research methods, production management, Geography, architectural and construction history, knowledge management, organization, evaluation and assessment methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Information Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here