Owner's role in construction safety: Guidance model

Huang, X and Hinze, J (2006) Owner's role in construction safety: Guidance model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(2), pp. 174-181. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The practices implemented by owners that were associated with better project safety performances were described in a companion paper. This paper will expand on those research findings and present a model that evaluates the impact of different owner practices on project safety performance. Four indices were established which quantitatively describe the project characteristics, the selection of safe contractors, the contractual safety requirements, and the owner's participation in safety management. Analysis of variance and linear regression were conducted to evaluate the combined effects of different owner practices on project safety performance as measured by the total recordable injury rate (TRIR). Results show that project safety performances were closely associated with all the indices except the index to describe the selection of safe contractors. The linear regression model explained 42.6% of the total variance of the TRIR. A scorecard to evaluate the owner's involvement in construction safety was developed to serve as a practical means of conducting an assessment and predicting project safety performance. The owner's involvement can favorably influence project safety performance by setting safety objectives, selecting safe contractors, and participating in safety management during construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: accident prevention; contracts; occupational safety; owners
Index terms: scorecard, construction safety, safety management, safety performance, accident prevention, injury, occupational safety, variance, regression model, owner
Subjects: environmental health, statistical analysis, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, measurement and scaling, sociology, performance measurement
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here