Lee, D E and Arditi, D (2006) Automated statistical analysis in stochastic project scheduling simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(3), pp. 268-277. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper describes a stochastic simulation-based scheduling system (S3) that: (1) integrates the deterministic critical path method (CPM), the probabilistic program evaluation and review technique (PERT), and the stochastic discrete event simulation (DES) approaches into a single system and lets the scheduler make an informed decision as to which method is better suited to the company's risk-taking culture; (2) automatically determines the minimum number of simulation runs in DES mode and therefore optimizes the simulation process; and (3) provides a terminal method that tests the statistical significance of the differences between simulations, hence eliminating outliers and therefore increasing the accuracy of the DES process. The system is based on an earlier version of the system called stochastic project scheduling simulation and makes use of all the capabilities of this system. The study is of value to practitioners because S3 produces a realistic prediction of the probability of completing a project in a specified time. The study is also of relevance to researchers in that it allows researchers to compare the outcome of CPM, PERT, and DES under different conditions such as different variability or skewness in the activity duration data, the configuration of the network, or the distribution of the activity durations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; critical path method; probability; scheduling; simulation; statistics |
| Index terms: | scheduler, risk taking, project scheduling, scheduling, accuracy, configuration, practitioner, critical path method, discrete event simulation, programme evaluation and review technique, statistical analysis, statistics, duration, variability |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, professional development, project controls, statistical analysis, systems engineering, mathematical modelling, practitioner, modelling and simulation, operations research, data science |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here