Lee, D E and Shi, J J (2006) Construction business automation system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(1), pp. 88-96. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper introduces a system prototype, the construction business automation system, for modeling and automating construction business processes by using workflow and object technologies. Construction management tasks are developed as distributed internet applications for supporting reusability of software components, simplifying process modeling, and automating business processes. The development of the prototype has resulted in the following technologies: (1) the object-oriented reusable component technology for modeling construction management tasks; (2) the construction business process modeler based on the task based modeling methodology; (3) the request driving methodology for raising business requests and instantiating corresponding process instances; and (4) the supporting technology for interacting with a commercial workflow engine (e.g., i-Flow) for executing business process instances. A purchasing process is used as an example to illustrate these related topics and the applicability of the methodologies in construction business automation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; business management; internet |
| Index terms: | process modelling, prototype, methodology, business management, workflow, purchasing, modelling, internet, automation |
| Subjects: | computing systems, business, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, design analysis, automation and robotics, management, research methods, procurement strategy |
| Topics: | Procurement, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here