Quantitative measurement of successful performance from the project manager's perspective

Menches, C L and Hanna, A S (2006) Quantitative measurement of successful performance from the project manager's perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(12), pp. 1284-1293. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper describes a process for converting a project manager's qualitative evaluation of "successful performance" to a quantitative measurement. In a recent study, randomly selected electrical companies throughout the United States submitted two projects for analysis: (1) one project that was well planned and performed successfully; and (2) one project that was poorly planned and performed less-than-successfully. Overall, 55 projects were evaluated. Success, however, is a subjective concept that often depends on the team member providing the definition. Consequently, during the interview process, project managers were asked to provide their own definition of successful performance, and this definition was matched to the collected data to identify appropriate variables for inclusion in a performance measurement index. A reliability analysis was performed, and six variables were ultimately used to construct the index, including actual percent profit, percent schedule overrun, amount of time given, communication between team members, budget achievement, and change in work hours. A cross-validation technique was used to evaluate the performance measurement index, and a misclassification rate of 2% was observed, which indicated that the model was useful for quantitatively measuring successful performance based on the project managers' definitions of success.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: measurement; performance characteristics; planning; project management
Index terms: performance-based, project manager, United States, performance measurement, profit, project management, reliability analysis, interview, schedule overrun, validation
Subjects: project management theory and practice, profession, project controls, Geography, data collection methods, performance measurement, professional development, economic analysis, reliability engineering
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here