Na, L J; Ofori, G and Park, M (2006) Stimulating construction innovation in Singapore through the national system of innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), pp. 1069-1082. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper examines the national approach to the stimulation of innovation in construction. Based on a qualitative systems thinking approach, a model of the National System of Innovation (NSI) is structured with five main NSI actors: local contractors; suppliers; national research institutions; government; and foreign contractors. This model, established by the assumption that local contractors' key motivation for innovation is based on profit maximization, highlights two main driving forces of construction innovation within the NSI: profit incentives and the social desirability of higher construction productivity and quality. The research findings indicate that high profit levels provide a higher number of growth momentums compared to the social desirability of innovation. Additionally, although social desirability of construction innovation is associated with a number of obstacles, high profit levels do not impose any significant hindrances. Based on the research findings, it is concluded that innovation policies should be focused on sustaining higher profit levels of contractors. The social desirability of innovation can be more efficiently utilized by regular reviews of national policies as the industry develops.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; innovation; simulation; Singapore |
| Index terms: | construction productivity, national policy, research institution, Singapore, local contractor, construction innovation, motivation, profit, maximization, foreign contractor, systems thinking |
| Subjects: | algorithms, Geography, building construction, research management, business, practitioner, operations management, public policy, psychology, analytical methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Governance, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Human Resources, International Construction, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here