Nepal, M P; Park, M and Son, B (2006) Effects of schedule pressure on construction performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(2), pp. 182-188. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Accelerating a project can be rewarding. The consequences, however, can be troublesome if productivity and quality are sacrificed for the sake of remaining ahead of schedule, such that the actual schedule benefits are often barely worth the effort. The tradeoffs and paths of schedule pressure-and its causes and effects-are often overlooked when schedule decisions are being made. This paper analyzes the effects that schedule pressure has on construction performance, and focuses on tradeoffs in scheduling. A research framework has been developed using a causal diagram to illustrate the cause-and-effect analysis of schedule pressure. An empirical investigation has been performed by using survey data collected from 102 construction practitioners working in 38 construction sites in Singapore. The results of this survey data analysis indicate that advantages of increasing the pace of work-by working under schedule pressure-can be offset by losses in productivity and quality. The negative effects of schedule pressure arise mainly by working out of sequence, generating work defects, cutting corners, and losing the motivation to work. The adverse effects of schedule pressure can be minimized by scheduling construction activities realistically and planning them proactively, motivating workers, and by establishing an effective project coordination and communication mechanism.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; labor; productivity; quality control; scheduling |
| Index terms: | scheduling, data analysis, construction site, survey, motivation, construction practitioner, tradeoff, Singapore, productivity, construction activity, construction performance, investigation, quality control, coordination |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, psychology, operations research, work location, construction operations, data analysis and analytics, performance assessment, project delivery, management, Geography, professional development, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Human Resources, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here