Shen, L Y; Lu, W S and Yam, M C H (2006) Contractor key competitiveness indicators: A China study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(4), pp. 416-424. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A proper method to assess contractor competitiveness is important both for assisting clients in the selection of proper contractors and for assisting contractors in the development of more competitive bidding strategies. Previous studies have identified various indicators for assessing contractor competitiveness, and several assessment methods have been introduced. Nevertheless, these studies are limited because they are unable to tell which indicators are more important in different market environments. This paper identifies the key competitiveness indicators (KCIs) for assessing contractor competitiveness in the Chinese construction market. An index value is used to indicate the relative significance of various competitiveness indicators based on which KCIs are identified. The data applied in this study are from a survey of the construction industry in mainland China. The research findings provide valuable information for both existing businesses and the construction professionals who plan to compete for construction works in the Chinese market. The study provides useful references for further studies that compare the KCIs used in the Chinese construction industry and those used in other construction industries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case reports; China; competition; contractors |
| Index terms: | construction professional, construction work, competitiveness, construction industry, construction market, competition, China, competitive bidding, strategy, survey |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, market analysis, Geography, professional development, management, bidding, operations management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Information Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here