What does the construction industry value in its workers?

Srour, I M; Haas, C T and Borcherding, J D (2006) What does the construction industry value in its workers? Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(10), pp. 1053-1058. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper briefly characterizes today's United States (U.S.) construction workforce, and attempts to provide evidence for what the construction industry most values in its workers. It presents the social and demographic characteristics of a sample of 862 construction workers, from 19 project sites that were interviewed in 2002, as part of a research effort at the University of Texas at Austin, and compares them with broader-based Bureau of Labor Statistics data to establish the degree to which they represent the U.S. construction workforce. Via statistical analysis, the paper explores the relationships between workers' attributes and how the industry compensates them as reflected in both hourly wages and average annual incomes. The statistical results reinforce what is known about the importance of years of experience; however, it also provides evidence of the importance of number of crafts each worker possessed, and computer knowledge. Less, but significant, evidence was obtained for the importance of the number of years spent with his/her current firm, craft training hours, age, or self-assessed performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: employees; regression analysis; salaries; training
Index terms: income, evidence, construction industry, United States, statistical analysis, construction worker, economic indicator, regression analysis, wages
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, data analysis and analytics, business economics, Geography, statistical analysis, economic analysis, industry analysis, data science
Topics: Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Human Resources, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here