Waara, F and Bröchner, J (2006) Price and nonprice criteria for contractor selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(8), pp. 797-804. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although the public sector has a long tradition of using the lowest bid as the award criterion for contracts, reliance on nonprice criteria is increasing. The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain how public owners use multiple criteria for the award of construction contracts. It is likely that nonprice criteria support the alignment of owner and contractor interests, and that bidder behavior should be affected by the likelihood of repeated contracts, and by the transparency of owners' evaluation procedures. Data from 386 bidding documents reflecting practice in Swedish municipalities in 2003 are analyzed. A typical pattern is a 70% price weight combined with three nonprice criteria. Price formulas, translating bid prices into scale values, were found to be based on the lowest bid, bid spread, or average bid. Nonprice criteria were evaluated on either relative or absolute merits. Owners should be aware of the incentives that their selection practices create and view this in a policy perspective, whereas contractors should be ready to assess the short and long term values of nonprice features.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractors; evaluation; incentives; learning; pricing |
| Index terms: | public sector, documents, owner, pricing, bidder, transparency, bidding, contractor selection, construction contract, municipality, public owner |
| Subjects: | professional development, economic analysis, bidding, contract type, tendering, administrative law, sociology |
| Topics: | Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here