Yu, A T W; Shen, Q; Kelly, J and Hunter, K (2006) Investigation of critical success factors in construction project briefing by way of content analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), pp. 1178-1186. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction project briefing is a complex and dynamic process which involves identifying and conveying clients' actual needs and requirements accurately to the project team. The briefing process is critical to the successful delivery of a construction project and there are many limitations inhibiting its effectiveness. A study of factors which could contribute to a successful briefing (in this study referred to as critical success factors) will enable special attention to be paid to those areas which could improve its performance. The objectives of this study are to identify, categorize, and prioritize a general set of critical success factors for construction project briefing. This study is intended to complement the existing but limited research into the identification of such factors and to serve as a stepping stone to the identification and establishment of yardsticks which could be used by construction practitioners on all projects in the future. A questionnaire was used to collect opinions from experienced construction practitioners. Thirty seven factors were identified and coded, and the content analysis yielded five major categories. They include project-related factors, human-related factors, process-related factors, input-related factors, and output-related factors. Thirty six percent of respondents identified "open and effective communication" as the most frequently mentioned factor critical to briefing. Other important factors, in descending order of importance, include such as "clear and precise briefing documents," "clear intention and objectives of client," and "clear project goal and objectives." This set of critical success factors can serve as a checklist for practitioners when conducting a briefing in their construction projects. The results of the questionnaire survey are generally in line with the findings of a validation exercise by a focus group meeting.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication; construction management |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, investigation, project team, exercise, construction project, documents, practitioner, questionnaire, validation, critical success factor, briefing, focus group, content analysis, survey, construction practitioner |
| Subjects: | performance management, professional development, production management, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, practitioner, scope management, health behaviours and lifestyles, control systems |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Health and Safety, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here