Particle swarm optimization-supported simulation for construction operations

Zhang, H; Tam, C M; Li, H and Shi, J J (2006) Particle swarm optimization-supported simulation for construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(12), pp. 1267-1274. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This study proposes an integration of particle swarm optimization (PSO) and a construction simulation so as to determine efficiently the optimal resource combination for a construction operation. The particle-flying mechanism is utilized to guide the search process for the PSO-supported simulation optimization. A statistics method, i.e., multiple-comparison procedure, is adopted to compare the random output performances resulting from the stochastic simulation model so as to rank the alternatives (i.e., particle-represented resource combinations) during the search process. The indifference zone and confidence interval facilitate consideration of the secondary performance measure (e.g., productivity) when the main performance measures (e.g., cost) of the competing alternatives are close. The experimental analyses demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed simulation optimization. The study aims to providing an alternative combination of optimization methodology and general construction simulation by utilizing PSO and a statistics method so as to improve the efficiency of simulation in planning construction operations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; optimization; particles; simulation
Index terms: methodology, integration, performance measure, construction simulation, statistics, confidence interval, effectiveness, productivity, construction operation, efficiency
Subjects: organizational analysis, statistical analysis, performance measurement, management, performance management, research methods, modelling and simulation, construction operations, mathematical modelling
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here