Abdel Aziz, A M (2007) Successful delivery of public-private partnerships for infrastructure development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(12), pp. 918-931. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Two common approaches have been used by governments for the implementation of public-private partnerships (PPPs): a finance-based approach that aims to use private financing to satisfy infrastructure needs, and a service-based approach that aims to optimize the time and cost efficiencies in service delivery. The implementation of PPPs, however, may suffer from legal, political, and cultural impediments. In the United States, the federal government enabled a number of acts to ease the impediments and promote PPPs for infrastructure development. Based on a detailed analysis of PPPs in the United Kingdom and British Columbia, Canada, this paper describes principles that would characterize the implementation of PPPs at the program level (e.g., whether the implementation is successful). The principles pertain to the: availability of a PPP legal framework and implementation units; perception of the private finance objectives, risk allocation consequences, and value-for-money objectives; maintenance of PPPs process transparency; standardization of procedures; and use of performance specifications. Guidelines for successful implementation are explained and discussed in the context of the United States PPPs experience and impediments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | build/operate/transfer; contracts; delivery; infrastructure; partnership; privatization |
| Index terms: | service delivery, partnership, private finance, Canada, standardization, risk allocation, implementation, privatization, process transparency, United States, United Kingdom, infrastructure development, performance specification, program, financing, cost efficiency, value-for-money |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, economic analysis, partnership management, performance measurement, management, economics, tendering, software systems, service delivery, Geography, evaluation, infrastructure engineering, financial risk |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Digital Applications, Value Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here