Balasubramanian, V and Prasad, G S (2007) Manual bar bending-an occupational hazard for construction workers in developing nations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(10), pp. 791-797. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Bar bending is the process of bending reinforcement bars to required angles in civil and construction engineering. Manual bar bending involves strenuous physical activity, which is usually performed in a poor ergonomic environment at a construction worksite. This could lead to chronic musculoskeletal disorders such as low back pain among bar benders. The aim of this study is to assess the ergonomics of manual bar bending and thereby develop a customized optimal workplace for bar bending. Biomechanical analysis was done using a three-dimensional Schultz-Andersson model to determine the influence of the diameter of the bar on the compressive force (Fc) at L5 S1. The effect of table height, grip arm distance, and back bend angle on Fc were also evaluated. Fc decreased up to 53%, with an increase of table height by 400 mm, and up to 41%, with an increase of grip arm distance by 500 mm; however it increased with back bend angle. Fc was higher than the NIOSH safety limit of (3.4 kN) in all cases except when bending 8 mm bars. A quick field reference for optimal table height and grip arm distance was prepared based on subjects' anthropometry and diameter, using Nash bargaining principles.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bars; decision making; developing countries; occupational safety |
| Index terms: | decision-making, construction worker, occupational hazard, developing nation, developing country, construction engineering, bargaining, reinforcement, back pain, ergonomics, physical activity, anthropometry, occupational safety |
| Subjects: | economics, occupational health and safety management, engineering methods, decision analysis, building materials, health behaviours and lifestyles, development economics, factor and component analysis, practitioner, health risk and incident analysis |
| Topics: | International Construction, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Materials, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here