Barraza, G A and Bueno, R A (2007) Probabilistic control of project performance using control limit curves. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(12), pp. 957-965. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study introduces a new probabilistic project control concept to assure an acceptable forecast of final project performance, in terms of not exceeding planned budget and schedule risk levels. This concept consists in the implementation of performance control limit curves for both actual cost and elapsed time, obtained with a probabilistic approach and a graphical representation referred to as Stochastic S curves (SS curves). In order to facilitate the project control process, control limit curves can be used to display and evaluate actual project performance status without the need of actualizing at completion performance forecasts. Three different approaches (quality, benchmarking, and incremental variance) are proposed in this paper for obtaining the project performance control limit curves. In order to find the control limit curve definition with more conservative acceptable performance variations, these approaches are tested in an example project. A further managerial advantage is found in the recommended approach, as it allows monitoring the use of both cost and scheduling contingencies, along the project execution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | forecasting; Monte Carlo method; probability; project management; simulation |
| Index terms: | graphical representation, project performance, s-curve, variance, project control, benchmarking, implementation, project management, scheduling, forecasting, actual cost, monitoring, variation |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, contractual condition, economics, measurement and scaling, prediction and forecasting, performance measurement, control systems, operations research, visualization, contractual arrangements, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Time Control, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Site Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here