Past perfect: Historical antecedents of modern construction practices

Diekmann, J E (2007) Past perfect: Historical antecedents of modern construction practices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(9), pp. 652-660. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper describes initial research on a project designed to understand the experiences of past generations of constructors and make that knowledge accessible to future generations of engineering students and construction practitioners. Much in the same way as medical students can trace their lineage back to Hippocrates, this project aims to provide architecture, engineering, and construction students, and professionals alike, a sense of their professional history. The project was developed around five time epochs, four geographic regions, and three different project types. We investigated issues such as the flow of money, training of workers, sharing of design knowledge, and nature of contracts and agreements. The central question posed by this work is how should knowledge of the history and evolution of construction practices be incorporated in the dialog that educators have with students and with the larger professional community? This research has led to multifaceted results. On the one hand, the message to students should be pride in their professional heritage because throughout time constructors and designers have used knowledge, perseverance, and innovation to accomplish remarkable projects. On the other hand, we have shown that much of what is considered new in the industry (alternative project delivery methods, worker safety programs, public private partnerships, and globalization) have historical antecedents and are not new at all.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; delivery; history; innovation
Index terms: historical antecedent, designer, evolution, worker safety program, globalization, project delivery, construction practitioner, history, public private partnership, agreements
Subjects: contractual arrangements, contract formation, occupational health, architectural and construction history, professional development, profession, environmental science, project delivery, economic factors
Topics: Procurement, Information Management, International Construction, Research Practice, Sustainability, Contract Administration, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here