El-Tayeh, A and Gil, N (2007) Using digital socialization to support geographically dispersed AEC project teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(6), pp. 462-473. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
In the field of knowledge management research, socialization means to convert individual into group tacit knowledge. This process matters from the outset of an architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) project to enhance collaborative work. Face-to-face meetings and phone calls undoubtedly facilitate socialization. However, meetings can be hard to timetable and expensive when AEC teams are geographically dispersed, whereas phone calls are cheap but offer limited capabilities for problem solving. Further, both media are not good at supporting asynchronous socialization. This study investigates the extent Internet-based media can promote cross-firm socialization and enhance collaborative work. The cross fertilization of findings from an exploratory case study with theory in computer-supported collaborative work (CSCW) informs the development of a conceptual framework on digital socialization. This framework underpins IDRAK-a proof-of-concept of a rich Internet application prototype to promote socialization in AEC projects. Our main contribution is the design of a novel methodology to evaluate the usability of digital systems to support socialization at the early design stage of an AEC project. The results from our lab experiments suggest that IDRAK can satisfactorily and efficiently enhance collaborative work. However, more research is needed, first, to evaluate the effectiveness of IDRAK to improve design quality and asynchronous socialization; and second, to investigate how other CSCW features can improve the performance of IDRAK-like systems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; project management |
| Index terms: | problem solving, methodology, knowledge management, tacit knowledge, conceptual framework, design quality, experiment, usability, prototype, face, effectiveness, media, early design stage, project management, project team, internet, case study |
| Subjects: | sociology, theoretical framing, performance management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, design process, project management theory and practice, professional development, psychology, modelling and simulation, professional practice, project delivery, data collection methods, user-centered design, computing systems |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here