Hegab, M Y and Smith, G R (2007) Delay time analysis in microtunneling projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(2), pp. 191-195. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Delay in microtunneling projects is a complex multivariate problem. Delay in microtunneling is defined as the nonworking time of a microtunneling project due to any reason other than scheduled stops. There are many reasons for delay such as mechanical failure of system components, leakage of hydraulic hoses, blockage of slurry pipes, and waiting time for excavated materials hauling equipment. Delay time increases the project duration and consequently the project cost. Delay data were collected from 35 microtunneling projects. Collected delay data were delay duration, delay reason, time, and location from the start to the stopping point. Five categories of delay causes were used in the analysis. Prediction of delay time will enhance the estimation accuracy of microtunneling project duration. A predictive model using a probabilistic approach was selected to represent the delay time. Based on data characteristics, a Weibull distribution was determined to best represent the overall delay duration in microtunneling projects. Using "regression with life data," expected overall delay in a microtunneling project could be predicted as a function of driven length. The model will help contractors to estimate total project time with reasonable accuracy. Knowing the anticipated delay time will allow contractors to have a point of comparison for actual performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; delay time; microtunneling; probabilistic methods; productivity |
| Index terms: | project cost, accuracy, microtunneling, estimation, productivity, hydraulic, duration, estimate |
| Subjects: | fluid mechanics, financial and cost management, professional development, economics, management, geotechnical engineering, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here