Schedule analysis under the effect of resource allocation

Ibbs, W and Nguyen, L D (2007) Schedule analysis under the effect of resource allocation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(2), pp. 131-138. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The construction industry has employed various schedule analysis techniques to support delay claims. Paradoxically, resource-related issues are frequently ignored even though they can affect project completion time, too. The research presented here shows that delay analysis without resource allocation practice substantially affects results of schedule analysis. Some delay can cause unrealistic resource allocation in downstream work, which in turn may further delay the project. The effect of resource allocation can either add to or reduce the severity of some delaying event. Apportionment of delay responsibility may be inaccurate unless resource allocation practice is considered in the analysis. Practical and necessary steps are proposed to enhance the existing window analysis technique. A case study is presented to compare the enhanced window analysis with the existing window analysis. This research enables practitioners to make delay analyses and claims more practical and reliable. Further studies are needed to improve the usability, credibility, and acceptability of schedule analysis considering resource allocation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: claims; delay time; resource management; scheduling
Index terms: scheduling, usability, practitioner, completion time, delay analysis, window, case study, resource allocation, resource management, construction industry
Subjects: user-centered design, data collection methods, control systems, practitioner, operations research, resource management, architectural elements, project controls, industry analysis
Topics: Site Management, Time Control, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here